Categories
News

Who Was Robin Hood’s First True Love?

For ’tis a fine life, and ’tis void of all strife. 
‘So ’tis, sir,’ Clorinda reply’d; 
‘But oh,’ said bold Robin, ‘How sweet would it be, 
If Clorinda would be my bride!’ She blusht at the motion; yet, after a pause 
Said, Yes, sir, and with all my heart; 
‘Then let’s send for a priest,’ said Robin Hood, 
‘And be married before we do part.’ Expert on the Robin Hood Folklore and Robin Hood enthusiast, Ralph Needham, says that the ballad must have been written long after the tale of Robin Hood became popular. To hear of anther love interest before Marian might imply that another story had taken place prior to the more popular version or as others might like to believe, there were additions to the legend long after it became such a popular tale. Nonetheless, Marian will always remain an important part of the story. The love between Robin Hood and Maid Marian is embedded among the larger picture, making it more intriguing. The ballad, the legend, the folktale, all ends with only one true love for Robin Hood, and that is what readers have always kept in their hearts; the love between himself and Maid Marian.]]>

Categories
Editorial

It’s Good to Be Bad: Shining the Spotlight on the Villain

And, really, if we take a quick look at some of the famous and infamous villains, such as Dr. Hannibal Lecter, Hans Gruber, Col. Hans Landa or The Joker, the films in which they appeared wouldn’t have had such an impact without them, or they would be something entirely different. And most actors relish playing those roles, as they can get away with a lot more, as opposed to when they are playing the hero. We always root for the heroes, but they are often one-dimensional characters, limited by the requirements of the script and the expectations of the audience, as they have to be the epitome of all that is good and righteous. Ok, maybe every now and then, there comes a hero that is a bit more complex and dark, with his own demons, but still, he has to obey some rules. A villain doesn’t have to do any of that. He’s not constrained by morals, ethics, and while we may not love them, we certainly love to hate them. If a villain is smart, powerful, ruthless, cunning and often charismatic, we feel that much more satisfied when the hero triumphs. But this is not only true of films. Examples of this can also be found in literature, mythology and folklore of all cultures, and while the line between these three is often blurred, and they share some of the stories and characters, the rules are almost the same. As this subject is really broad, this time we’re going to focus on one well-known Hero vs. Villain rivalry, the one between Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Nottingham. Without question, the Sheriff of Nottingham is Robin Hood’s principal nemesis. There have been many incarnations of both Robin and the Sheriff in films, literature, folklore and each of them brought something new, establishing a distance from the original story in terms of accuracy. It is almost impossible to determine the real facts, or even if Robin or Sheriff were historical figures, but, that’s not our concern at this time. We’re going to focus on what’s common to all the interpretations, the antagonism between the two of them. A good source, if you’re interested in a more in-depth study, is “Robin Hood: A Collection of All the Ancient Poems, Songs, and Ballads, Now Extant, Relative to That Celebrated English Outlaw; To Which Are Prefixed Historical Anecdotes of His Life” by Joseph Ritson (PIBN: 1000597106). We practically know all there is to know about Robin Hood, but the same cannot be said about the Sheriff of Nottingham. The Sheriff himself was appointed by the King, as a legal authority, but that certainly didn’t make him the moral authority, as he and his henchmen were rotten and corrupt, introducing unfair taxes and robbing the people they supposed to protect, executing everyone who stood in their path. He is most commonly portrayed as intelligent, ruthless, greedy figure, who will do anything to stop Robin Hood, the only one brave enough to stand up to him. While we are more familiar with Robin, as he is the hero of this story, and more attention has been given to him and the people around him, such as the Merry Men, or Maid Marian, some space has been left for the Sheriff of Nottingham to counterbalance the good deeds done by Robin, thus making the story more suspenseful and making the hero more likable by setting him up against a truly heinous villain. And although the Sheriff doesn’t have the support of the people, or his associates, which might assist him sometimes, but at the same time have their own agenda, he still has considerable means at his disposal which he uses to battle Robin, including his blackmail, bribe, money or worse. Even though he is evil, he isn’t just a mere psychopath, spewing venom, but a more shrewd, calculated figure, driven by ambition and greed, using his intellect in addition to violence to remove the opponents who stand in his way. In that aspect, he serves as a perfect foil for Robin Hood, displaying character traits of equal intensity, but on the opposite end of the scale. Also, some of the tactics employed by Robin and his men, such as theft, are justified as they present the only way of fighting the villainous authority figure. And that is the key fact that explains our perception of a hero: as someone who is defined by his great deeds, and not necessarily someone who is morally incorruptible. That, in turn, defines the role of a villain, as well, who isn’t burdened by similar requirements. The villain’s job is to provide the archenemy and moral nemesis for our hero. That’s what makes a villain. However, being a great villain is something a lot more complex, as the author needs to infuse the character with a human element, motivation and the reasons for his wrongdoings, making him into something more than a cardboard cutout. As a consequence of that, the story sets itself apart from the bunch, ultimately becoming something more: a legend.]]>

Categories
Editorial

King Ludd Versus Modernisation

The Wronged Apprentice Historians have found some evidence of person around whom the Ludd legend might have developed. It is possible he might have been an apprentice cloth worker in the late 1700s in the Midlands county of Leicestershire. His employer thought that Ludd could work harder and decided to report his laziness to the local justice of the peace. Ludd faced a whipping and became so enraged by his master’s action that he smashed the knitting machine with a hammer. Yet the Ludd who lay behind the violent industrial unrest in the second decade of the nineteenth century is not yet identified with a particular individual. Most historians believe that he was an imaginary character who conveniently allowed local activists to portray themselves as part of a more powerful movement, or perhaps to shift responsibility for violent actions. The Years of Ludd The first record of the name Ned Ludd in connection with an industrial dispute appeared on letters sent to mill owners in Nottingham in 1811. The frame knitters felt threatened by the introduction of powered knitting machinery in local factories. The letters were followed by attacks on the factories and hundreds of these modern knitting frames were smashed. Many of these machines were built by a manufacturer named Enoch, but Enoch also curiously enough made the large hammers Ludd’s followers used to smash the machines. Thus the expression began to circulate, “Enoch did make it, and Enoch will break it.” This was a period of great distress in the Midlands and North. Prices were rising and workers who had supported themselves by working from home were losing their independence and being forced into the highly-disciplined factory environment. Gathering around the banner of Ned Ludd weavers and cloth finishers attacked the new factories and destroyed the new machinery. On a number of occasions the factory owners saw what was coming and defended their business with firearms. Soldiers were also dispatched to restore order. Draconian laws were passed introducing the penalty of death for destruction of mill machinery. When the followers of Ned Ludd killed Yorkshire mill owner William Horsfall in 1812, over 60 people were arrested for this murder and an attack on a Huddersfield factory. Of the arrested men seventeen were executed on the gallows. In another prosecution for Luddite activity in Lancashire one of those arrested and executed was a 12 year old boy. By 1817 these oppressive measures had succeeded in breaking the Luddite movement and worker unrest took other avenues. The Power of Ludd The obvious question is how could the Ludd character form a rallying point for workers in different industries across a wide geographical area? Nobody today believes that Ludd was a real person who stood at the head of an organized movement. The best way of understanding this phenomenon is to place Ludd in a similar category as Robin Hood. In a similar way that Robin Hood stories came to represent the struggle of ordinary people against a repressive, powerful authority, Ludd took on the role of the protector of the workers against the encroachment of the new factory system. Ludd upheld the rights of the downtrodden handloom worker against the threat to their livelihoods from new technology and greedy employers.]]>