Categories
News

Victims of Shocking Murder Found In Lizzie Borden's House

Lizzie Borden took an axe, And gave her mother forty whacks; When she saw what she had done, She gave her father forty-one. However, at her trial the 32 year old Borden was quickly found innocent, the jury taking just 90 minutes to reach its verdict. The Bordens were a wealthy family, Andrew Borden a highly successful businessman in real estate and manufacturing. With his first wife: Sarah, Andrew had two daughters: Lizzie, born in 1860; and Emma, born in 1851. Tragically, Sarah passed away shortly after Lizzie’s birth. Three years after his wife passed away Andrew remarried, to Abby Durfee Gray. Various reports suggest the two Borden daughters had a poor relationship with their stepmother, formally addressing her as Mrs Borden at all times. Lizzie and Emma were supposedly concerned that Abby had designs on stealing their father’s fortune for her own blood relatives. At the time of the gruesome murders the four Bordens all lived in the same household, along with a host of maids and servants. Neither of the Borden daughters were married, a social stigma at the time; and a tense relationship existed between Lizzie and Emma, and their elderly stepmother. On 4th August, 1892, Andrew Borden was found bludgeoned to death in a pool of blood on the living room couch. So brutally had he been attacked that his face is claimed to have been left split in two. Abby was then found upstairs (although it was later deduced that she had actually been killed first), her head and face also brutally bludgeoned. Suspicion soon turned to Lizzie. Along with a servant, she was the only other person in the house the night her father and stepmother were killed. A sensational trial soon started, one which garnered national attention. Lizzie and her sister Emma gained $7 million in inheritance after their father’s death, money which many consider to have been Lizzie’s motive. Circumstantial evidence soon began to appear tying Lizzie to the gruesome crime. It was claimed that the day after the murders Lizzie had burned one of her dresses, her explanation was that it had been stained with paint. Meanwhile, according to a local pharmacy owner, the day before the murder Lizzie had visited his store and tried to buy a deadly poison – perhaps suggesting she had murder on her mind. At the same time, Lizzie’s account seemed dubious. She claimed to have been out in the house’s yard at the time her father was murdered, hearing nothing and not seeing the perpetrator. Nevertheless, there was a total lack of forensic evidence available to the prosecution. Lizzie had no traces of blood on her, a remarkable fact if she had actually carried out the brutal crime. Some doctors’ reports from the time claimed that the severity of the injuries on the Bordens could have only been inflicted by a tall man (although this was contested). What’s more, Andrew Borden had made a host of enemies: both powerful business rivals and disgruntled staff. The murder weapon itself, a hatchet, was found but police were reluctant to use fingerprint analysis on it. The pioneering forensic technique had been growing in popularity in Europe, but the Fall River police force remained skeptical of its validity. This reluctance likely ended any chance of finding out for sure whether Lizzie Borden was as guilty as the rhyme written about her claims. Despite being found innocent, the media continued to portray Lizzie as a murderer. She lived the remainder of her life an orphaned, wealthy heiress in privacy until she died in 1927. She was interred next to her father and stepmother. ]]>

Categories
News

Were Sacco and Vanzetti Innocent?

The ability to analyse ballistics in 1920 was of course limited compared to modern standards. Advances over the decades however, have seen the ballistics evidence reexamined several times, starting with the development of the comparison microscope just before the men’s executions in 1927. Each reevaluation of the evidence, in 1927, 1961 and 1983, all came to the same conclusion, Sacco’s revolver was the one which had been used to kill the security guard and the paymaster. On the other hand, some have accused the police of planting the bullet used in ballistics tests, observing that the one which matched Sacco’s gun didn’t match any others at the crime scene. Others argue the gun in Vanzetti’s possession which the prosecution claimed he had stolen from one of the victims, was in fact the wrong caliber and serial number. A book written by Felix Frankfurter, future Supreme Court Justice, in 1927, argued that there was little evidence to support the guilty verdict. It is unlikely if Sacco and Vanzetti’s guilt or innocence will ever be proven either way (there is also a third school of thought which reasons that Sacco was guilty but Vanzetti innocent). What is clear however, is that they were denied justice. As Massachusetts governor Governor Michael Dukakis proclaimed in 1977, the men had clearly not received a fair trial. Guilty or not, they were victims of the prejudices of the time, highlighted most clearly in the repeated refusal to allow them a retrial, despite new evidence surfacing.]]>

Categories
News

First Charges Brought Against My Lai Soldiers

Categories
News

Chicago 7: Sentencing in the Trial Of the Century

The Nation as a ‘Monumental Non-Event’. The sentencing of the Chicago Seven on 19th February 1970 brought to a close a major court case which is now, at least in some corners, dismissed as meaningless. The trial originated in the fierce anti-Vietnam War movement that had become increasingly vocal throughout the 1960s. In August 1968, a series of protests were organised at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Around 10,000 anti-Vietnam War protesters gathered in the city, determined to disrupt the convention as much as possible in protest at continued US involvement in the war, and other policies of Lyndon B. Johnson’s government. Chicago Mayor Richard Daley took a strict stance against the protesters, and police were deployed around the city to break up demonstrations, among other things enforcing 11pm curfews in the city’s parks where the protesters intended to congregate. The heavy handed tactics of the police saw conflicts erupt on the streets of Chicago and riots break out across the city over the course of several days. In the end, some 589 protesters were arrested, and 218 people imprisoned. Eight activists were charged for organising the riots (the Chicago Eight became the Chicago Seven when it was decided to charge one of the activists separately.) Those accused of organising the event ranged from pacifists to grass roots political activists and a member of the Black Panthers. The eight charged were: David Dellinger, a pacifist and chairman of the National Mobilization against the War; Tom Hayden and Rennie Davis, leaders of the Students for a Democratic Society, Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, leaders of the Youth International Party; John Froines and Lee Weiner, local Chicago organizers; and Bobby Seale, co-founder of the Black Panther party. A five month trial followed, which repeatedly threatened to descend into farce. All of the defendants were charged with conspiracy to incite a riot. Bobby Seale started to disrupt the trial in protest at not being represented by the lawyer he had chosen. After gagging and bounding him to a seat failed to stop his loud protests, the judge ordered that Seale be tried separately, leaving the Chicago Seven. A key piece of evidence for conspiracy used against them was an activist meeting several months before the Democratic National Convention. Controversy was never far from the trial. Many observers accused the highly conservative Judge Julius Hoffmann of having a bias against the defendants, citing his rejection of many of the defense’s pre-trial motions, despite having accepted most of those requested by the prosecution. The defendants also did their best to disrupt the trial, eating jelly beans, wearing outlandish clothes and cracking jokes to trivialise the whole thing and poke fun at the US legal system. Daily protests outside the courthouse took place in solidarity with the defendants. Increasingly, the event became a public spectacle. The defence argued the charges were an official over reaction. A host of singers, artists and activists were brought into court in an attempt to explain what the demonstrators objected to in American society, turning the trial into a platform for their anti-establishment views. At the end of the trial, five of the defendants, Rubin, Hoffman, Hayden, Davis and Dellinger, were found guilty of inciting riots but not conspiring to do so. Weiner and Froines were acquitted of all charges. However, all seven defendants, along with two defence lawyers and Seale, were sentenced to jail time for contempt of court. Ultimately, none of the Chicago Seven served jail time. In 1972, a Court of Appeal overturned the convictions, pointing to Judge Hoffman’s hostility to the defendants and procedural errors. Although often called meaningless, generally in reference to the fact the defendants were charged and not jailed; and the severity of the charges against them had been reduced, the Chicago Seven trial was important in giving a very public platform to critics of the Vietnam War.]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Nazi Adolf Eichmann’s Letter Pleads Innocence

trial in Israel. After leaving school, Eichmann briefly worked in the mining company owned by his father in Austria, where the family had lived since leaving Germany in 1914. Starting in 1927 he sold oil as a travelling salesman. He joined the Nazi Party in 1932, and the Security Service (Sicherheitsdienst) after returning to Germany in 1933. He was appointed to lead the department that was responsible for all Jewish affairs, namely emigration, which was often encouraged by the Nazis using economic pressure and violence. After the start of WWII (September, 1939) Eichmann, along with his staff, planned and organized the moving of Jews into the ghetto areas within major cities, expecting to transport them either farther east or overseas. Eichmann prepared plans for two Jewish reservations, in Poland and Madagascar, which were never carried out. International Holocaust Remembrance Day (January, 27th) was declared an international day of remembrance by the United Nations General Assembly on November, 1, 2005, to commemorate the genocide by the Nazi’s which resulted in the death of over 6 million Jewish people, 250,000 physically and mentally disabled people, 2 million Romani people, and 9,000 homosexual males.]]>

Categories
News

Bloody Sunday – British Troops Shoot Unarmed Protesters

The Wolfe Tones – Go On Home British Soldiers Its depiction in Irish rebel songs such as ‘Go On Home British Soldiers’ shows that for many in Ireland the massacre was just another tragedy in a centuries old conflict between British imperialism and Irish nationalism. The Bloody Sunday massacre was absorbed into the tradition of rebel music which had for centuries railed against British interference in Ireland and Northern Ireland. It took decades for the British government to accept the responsibility of its military for the massacre. A controversial report, headed by High Court Justice Lord Widgery, was published in summer 1972. It exonerated the British troops, and suggested that the protesters had been carrying explosives and other weapons. It wasn’t until 2010 that a new report into the events was published, headed by Lord Savile it laid responsibility for the massacre with the British army and cleared all of the victims of any wrong doing. Among other crucial conclusions, it claimed the soldiers opened fire without warning and subsequently attempted to cover up their actions, and that the protesters were all unarmed. In November 2015 a former British soldier was arrested for questioning in regards to the shootings, showing that 44 years on, the Bloody Sunday massacre is yet to be truly resolved. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: SeanMack ]]>

Categories
Breaking News

An Inauspicious Execution Location for Witch Trial Victims

Categories
News

Salem Repents For Witch-Trials

Categories
News

Lady Chatterley's Lover Deemed Not Pornographic

Categories
News

'Obscene' Howl Performed for the First Time