Categories
Editorial

Indiana Jones Came to Life

A professor was proclaimed as the Real-Life Indiana Jones when he made a groundbreaking decoding on a mysterious ancient manuscript. Fictional Indiana Jones may have found his real- life counterpart when a professor from the University of Bedfordshire decoded the legendary and mysterious Voynich manuscript. Recently Stephen Bax, a professor of Applied Linguistics, has attracted international attention by becoming the first professional linguist to crack the code of the 600 year-old manuscript. Bulletin-of-the-New-York-Public-LibraryThe Voynich manuscript is a pictorial codex hand-written in a mysterious writing system, named after Polish book dealer Wilfrid Voynich, who purchased it in 1912. The pages of the codex, which was written on vellum, have been carbon dated to the early 15th century, between 1404 and 1438. The content features illustrations of exotic plants, stars, and mysterious human figures, as well as many pages written in an unknown text. Its origin is unknown, with the earliest confirmed owner a Polish alchemist named Georg Baresch. Professor Bax has begun to unlock the mystery meanings of the Voynich manuscript using his wide knowledge of mediaeval manuscripts and his familiarity with Semitic languages such as Arabic. He is working through it letter by letter using careful linguistic analysis. He explained, “I hit on the idea of identifying proper names in the text, following historic approaches which successfully deciphered Egyptian hieroglyphs and other mystery scripts, and I then used those names to work out part of the script.” “The manuscript has a lot of illustrations of stars and plants. I was able to identify some of these, with their names, by looking at mediaeval herbal manuscripts in Arabic and other languages, and I then made a start on a decoding, with some exciting results,” he added. The term for Taurus is one of the words he managed to identify. Other than that, a constellation of of seven stars which may be the Pleiades, and also a picture of the plant Centaury, a known mediaeval herb, as well as a number of other plants. Professor Bax was reported to have conducted a lecture that focused on the procedure and problems in decoding the manuscript, and also discussed moves to identify the underlying language of the manuscript. The Voynich manuscript has earned a reputation for being ‘the most mysterious’ manuscript on the planet. Even though he has so far managed to crack only part of the manuscript, that alone is quite a breakthrough and will no doubt pave a path for like-minded enthusiasts to join the manuscript-decoding party. The Voynich manuscript is a world-renowned case in history of cryptography. Many cryptographers, professional and amateur, have tried and fail. Even codebreakers from World War 1 and World War 2 were unable to penetrate into its inscrutable content. Its obscure reputation grew with the emergence of some rather grand theories. Some suggested it was the work of a young Leonardo da Vinci, various secret groups, or even Aztecs. Some even went further and proclaimed it was transcribed by something not from this earth, while other, more pessimistic people stated that the manuscript might be nonsense. Even though the manuscript is not fully decoded yet, Professor Bax’s work would undoubtedly serves as a much-needed trigger that would launch the journey of its full decipherment to its eventual success.]]>

Categories
Book Reviews

The Importance of the Mississippi River in Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn

Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (Tom Sawyer's Comrade)Said to have been based on Mark Twain’s Memoir, Life on the Mississippi, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn follows the life of a young adventurous boy (Huck Finn) as he runs away from both his guardian, the Widow Douglas and his father Pap. He accidentally teams up with another runaway, a slave named Jim. As the two set off they hope to find freedom from different things; Huck from both the thought of being “civilized” and his drunken father, and Jim from his current life. Jim is a slave and is running away to become a free man so he can in turn free his family from slavery. The two unlikely friends journey down the Mississippi in what turns out to be a series of adventures filled with death, disguise and eventually not just the growth and maturity of their friendship but also of Huck.  The river, on which their journey is set, is an important motif and acts as both the agent that brings the two closer to their destination as the motion that pushes Twain’s story along. The Mississippi is the fourth largest river in the world and stretches over ten US states. What has made the Mississippi River so famous is not only the importance it plays to those towns surrounding it but the way in which Mark Twain uses the river in many of his literary works as an important motif. Twain retells his experiences on the Mississippi river in a memoir published in 1883, centered on his life as a steamboat pilot. It follows his journeys on the Mississippi from St Louis to New Orleans. His own experiences were what inspired the 1834 novel, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Twain’s recount of Huck’s journey along the river maps the road to the young boy discovering himself. One of the most obvious features of the river is the way in which it provides a hidden getaway for anyone who wants a quick way out of town. Because the river spans so many states, one could easily hide in one of the many towns that the river passes though. The river acts as a back road and is the first option for making hasty retreat. It begins as a friendly journey as Jim and Huck gain a raft and food that has been washed up. Twain seems to point out how giving the river can be and how much they can hide comfortably on this hidden trail, but it doesn’t stay calm for too long. Their subsequent encounters with hoodlums, thieves, liars and murderers shows that just like the river that can be friendly on some days and rough and engulfed in fog on other days, such are their experiences; they might be able to sail smoothly and bask in the sunshine and the quietude on parts of their adventures, but not far downstream they can encounter rough waters. Another astounding feature worthy of mentioning is the way in which Twain seems to compare the Mississippi river with the aristocracies. Huck ends up meeting a family known as the Grangerfords and realizes they have been locked in a feud for years with their neighbors, the Shepherdsons , a family with whom they attend church. There is no difference with life on the Mississippi and life among these people. Their longstanding feud erupts when two members of either family decided to elope. The feud turns deadly and seems to reflect Huck’s earlier experiences on the river where a feud between friends ended in death. There is a stark comparison between the two worlds as Huck seems to have been caught in between the two. Twain’s love for the Mississippi river is no doubt evident in the novel. It is portrayed not just a long and winding avenue that leads out of town and away from potential conflicts but a road that enables one to find themselves.]]>

Categories
News

The D-Day Invasion

The D Day Invasion was one of the most notable events in World War 2. In fact, it is one of the world’s most remembered events as it was a precursor to the fall of Adolf Hitler. Following yearlong planning, The United Allies launched what was and still remains the largest seaborne attack in history. D Day Invasion refers to the invasion of Normandy (also called Operation Neptune) by the united armies of America, Canada and England on June 6, 1944. It proved a significant turning point for Hitler’s Nazi Army and had been in the planning phase from the previous year. The then commander of the Allied forces who went on to become president of the United States, Dwight Eisenhower, was one of the key players in launching an attack on the unsuspecting Germans. Planning had officially commenced in 1943, and launched a year later on June 6th 1944, two days later than originally planned. British, Canadian and US fleets took over the shoreline and sky at around midnight on June 6 1944. The attack was originally planned for June 2, 1944 but had to be delayed due to inclement weather conditions.  The attacks commenced at midnight with the launch of airborne divisions who parachuted their way in. The German troops saw the largest army advancing towards shore on the morning of June 6 1944. There was a fierce battle and even though the Germans fought back heavily, they eventually retreated. D Day attacks saw a resistance in the German army which encouraged the united troupe’s top push towards Berlin. Prior to D Day, Operation bodyguard was launched as a decoy to distract the German troops so they were unaware of the details of the location and timing of Operation Neptune. D Day Invasions came as a result of Hitler’s refusal to surrender to the Allies. Key points in France were taken over even though it was being occupied by the Nazis. The operation was a catalyst for a number of important event s which led to Hitler’s defeat. It was meticulously planned and carried out with expert precision. The Allies could hardly believe some of the discoveries that were made as they marched on Germany. The discovery of concentrations camps that were being used to “cleanse” the world of Jews, homosexuals or anyone else the Nazi regime had declared deviant was a true testament to just how large the holocaust was.  The D Day invasions saw the start of a new beginning for many people who were under fear of Hitler’s rule. Following the Battle at Normandy, Hitler’s army was defeated, his closest allies surrendered or changed sides and he finally committed suicide before the allied or Russian forces could reach him. The memories of Operation Neptune are recognized annually in the form of memorials and tributes at the location points where the invasion took place. Most notable among them are Omaha Beach, Pegasus Bridge and the German war cemeteries that exist nearby. A recognition ceremony for those who fought and perished in the D Day invasion is held yearly to honor the brave soldiers who went above and beyond their call of duty to fight for their country to achieve a greater good.]]>

Categories
News

Who Was Robin Hood’s First True Love?

For ’tis a fine life, and ’tis void of all strife. 
‘So ’tis, sir,’ Clorinda reply’d; 
‘But oh,’ said bold Robin, ‘How sweet would it be, 
If Clorinda would be my bride!’ She blusht at the motion; yet, after a pause 
Said, Yes, sir, and with all my heart; 
‘Then let’s send for a priest,’ said Robin Hood, 
‘And be married before we do part.’ Expert on the Robin Hood Folklore and Robin Hood enthusiast, Ralph Needham, says that the ballad must have been written long after the tale of Robin Hood became popular. To hear of anther love interest before Marian might imply that another story had taken place prior to the more popular version or as others might like to believe, there were additions to the legend long after it became such a popular tale. Nonetheless, Marian will always remain an important part of the story. The love between Robin Hood and Maid Marian is embedded among the larger picture, making it more intriguing. The ballad, the legend, the folktale, all ends with only one true love for Robin Hood, and that is what readers have always kept in their hearts; the love between himself and Maid Marian.]]>

Categories
Breaking News

500 Year Old Dictionary

th century dictionary, potential buyers would have to spend £92,500. ]]>

Categories
Breaking News

5000 Year Old Painting Destroyed By Thieves in Jaen Province, Spain

Categories
News

The 1812 War; The Birth of the Star Spangled Banner

American President James Madison Declares War on Britain On June 1, 1812, the fourth American President, James Madison declared war on Britain. His decision was spurred by what he and other congressmen believed to be ongoing issues with the British government. They seemed to have scant regard for American citizens, as the British government would force men to join the Royal Navy without warning, there were trade restrictions imposed as a result of the ongoing war between Britain and France, along with many other complaints. President Madison had surmised that Britain would have been distracted by the current war and Canada (a territory they hoped to capture) would give in easily.  The fact that the American soldiers were low in numbers, and lacking in confidence and discipline, was not seen as an important factor. Due to this poor judgment the war was expected to be quick and easy, it would not be. The United States at that time was in opposition to the ongoing war between France and Britain.  Britain on the other hand saw America as a threat not only because of their stance on the Napoleonic wars but also because their naval empire was growing, leaving Britain feeling vulnerable on the seas. There was also rivalry regarding Britain’s recruitment of what America recognized as naturalized American citizens. The Royal Navy would, without warning, go after British born sailors who had deserted their fleet. While this angered Americans, Britain ignored it and continued. Britain apparently did not take into account that America was uncomfortable with the fact that they did not recognize naturalized American citizens and Britain continued to round them up, leading America to believe that Britain did not think they were not good enough to naturalize former British citizens. After days of deliberations voting was finally complete, and on June 18, more than two weeks after it was declared by the president, the Americans officially began war with Britain by launching their attack at the Canadian borders, seizing parts of what was known then as British North America. Ironically, a peace message was sent by Lord Liverpool on June 23, less than a month after he came into power. Following the assassination of Spencer Percival, the previous Prime Minister, Lord Liverpool’s ascent to the post of Prime Minister came with a need for a change in the relationship between the United States and Britain. Though the peace message was sent, because of the lengthy trip across the continents, President Madison never received it in time. Similar to the lengthy time it took for the message of peace to reach American soil, such was the fate of the declaration of war that was sent by the president. Both Armies Ill-Prepared Though the US army was sparse (with less than 12000 soldiers), an effort was made to expand the army when it became evident that the fighting would go on longer than was anticipated. This proved difficult for the Americans as there were no real motivation for men to willingly want to become a part of the fighting. When up against the British forces they were near powerless as the raw recruits were no match for the highly experienced British soldiers, who had cut their teeth fighting the armies of Napoleon. Another blow to the US army was the lack of funding; the pay was low and was a turn off to potential recruits. Service men involved in the fighting were mostly volunteering and there was a lack of discipline. In fact, more time was spent evading the British army than was spent defending the country. On the other hand for much of the war the British forces were largely engaged in fighting on the European mainland. The US army led by General William Hull, on June 12, 1812, invaded the Canadian town of Sandwich. A month later in Detroit, they surrendered to a smaller group of British soldiers, who were under the command of Major General Isaac Brock. The Americans were adamant in their quest to take over Canada and launched another attack in the Niagara Peninsular some months later. This again proved futile as even though Major General Brock was killed, the British were able to once again defeat them.  This constant defeat prolonged the war longer than The US had hoped. The US army would later reorganize their troops but they were never able to conquer Canada. By 1814, Napoleon had abdicated, giving the British Army more elbow room to focus on the War in America. This placed the war in a different light as Britain could now allow for more troops to be deployed to the US. They sent veteran soldiers to fight led by Major General Robert Ross and Rear Admiral George Cockburn, who were two major players in the Burning of Washington.  An attack was launched on New York, however the American Army was finally getting its composure and had gained requisite experience to be recognized as worthy foes. Britain was not about to acquiesce however, as another attack was launched, this time at Chesapeake Bay. For the British army, the Chesapeake Bay attack was a definite success. The Attack on Washington The attack on Washington was led by Major General Robert Ross and would go down in history as possibly the most brazen attack on the US capital. Such was its severity that there were talks to relocate the capital to another state. British soldiers marched through the streets of Washington and set fire to many public buildings. Word reached the White House that the British soldiers were on their way, before the army had reached the White House, it was abandoned. First lady Dolley Madison stayed behind and, with the help of a few slaves, she was able to secure the valuables before the soldiers arrived. When they did, they did not hesitate to partake of the feast that was prepared for the president’s dinner and then proceeded to destroy the building. Fuel was added to the fire to prolong the burning straight into the night, luckily the walls remained intact and were later restored during a cleanup exercise. The burning of the White House was condemned by many European leaders and Britain was frowned upon for behaving lewdly on international soil. In return Britain lashed out by saying the American had started the war initially, they believed their actions were justified based on the US invasion of Canada. Nonetheless, it had placed Britain in a bad light. Following the burnings, there was an effort to relocate the capital to another state but with quick funding from Washington businessmen, the buildings were hastily restored in time for the inauguration of James Monroe, who succeeded Madison in 1817. Victory for the US and Birth of the Star Spangled Banner Following the attack on Washington, America struggled to secure their dignity and was able to secure one small victory with the battle of Fort McHenry. The British thought it was the perfect place to launch an attack because of the close proximity to the capital, but they were firing from too far out which proved futile. Plans to go ashore for a more intimate attack were abandoned. On the morning after the bombardment, the American flag remained standing proud, signaling victory for the US. The flag flying amidst the darkness of dawn was an observation made by attorney Francis Scott Key which led him to write a poem that eventually became “The Star Spangled Banner”. The song itself was originally written as a poem entitled “Defense of Fort M’Henry”. On September 3, 1814, Scott Key was on a mission to negotiate the release of a popular doctor who had been captured by the British soldiers. Key was selected by the American President to be a prisoner-of- war exchange officer. On the said morning, he and fellow lawyer John Stuart Skinner went aboard Major General Robert Ross’s ship, the HMS Tonnant, to present their case. They bore letters signed by president Maddison and by soldiers vouching for the doctor’s kind-heartedness. They were able to witness first hand planning of the attack by Ross and his fellow soldiers. They were themselves kept prisoner until those plans were executed as they were seen as a threat. They were however able to witness the attack from their own boat and seeing the American Flag waving to signal victory, he was inspired to write the lyrics to “The Star Spangled Banner”. Though Key was the writer, it was on the initiative of Skinner, who Keys showed his work, that the poem was eventually published. The poem was set to a key of an already popular British song known as the “Anacreontic Song”. It was adopted into song and became the US national anthem in 1931 under the guidance of President Herbert Hoover. The Treaty of Gent In 1814, in Belgium at a town called Ghent, both parties agreed to meet and began peace talks. Both the US and Britain had concluded that they had achieved what they intended. Border restrictions were removed and territories that were captured during the war were given back to the party that was the original owner. Many of the issues were resolved, but ironically the issues that had initially led to the war were not mentioned in the treaty.  The treaty of Ghent did not happen overnight, achieving a common decision was a war within itself. Some points were agreed upon while others were in total disagreements. One issue was the migrant slaves who were lured away during the war. To add to their numbers Britain had used a number of tactics to overcome the Americans, one such action being that they welcomed American slaves with open arms, promising them freedom and a ticket to fight against the Americans. Many slaves took advantage of this opportunity and migrated to England and eventually settled in parts of Canada. These slaves were never returned and America thought Britain was being unfair and in violation of the treaty. Britain eventually agreed to reimburse slave owners a sum of $1 204 960. After being at loggerhead five months of negotiations later, they were finally at an agreement. Both America and Britain suffered severe loss and it is still unclear as to who really won. Each country was of the view that they had won the war. Both parties suffered casualties and monetary losses that put their country at a loss. Britain’s debt increased significantly which was one of the factors that led to a closure of the war and talks of peace. Canada was one of the biggest parties to gain as they had successfully retained freedom from United States and still remained a part of the British Empire. “Precis of the Wars in Canada” gives full details on the war as it happened in Canada. The end of the Anglo- American war saw a growing friendship between the two countries and both parties have long since enjoyed over 200 years of peace, described in more recent times as a “special relationship”.]]>

Categories
Editorial

King Ludd Versus Modernisation

The Wronged Apprentice Historians have found some evidence of person around whom the Ludd legend might have developed. It is possible he might have been an apprentice cloth worker in the late 1700s in the Midlands county of Leicestershire. His employer thought that Ludd could work harder and decided to report his laziness to the local justice of the peace. Ludd faced a whipping and became so enraged by his master’s action that he smashed the knitting machine with a hammer. Yet the Ludd who lay behind the violent industrial unrest in the second decade of the nineteenth century is not yet identified with a particular individual. Most historians believe that he was an imaginary character who conveniently allowed local activists to portray themselves as part of a more powerful movement, or perhaps to shift responsibility for violent actions. The Years of Ludd The first record of the name Ned Ludd in connection with an industrial dispute appeared on letters sent to mill owners in Nottingham in 1811. The frame knitters felt threatened by the introduction of powered knitting machinery in local factories. The letters were followed by attacks on the factories and hundreds of these modern knitting frames were smashed. Many of these machines were built by a manufacturer named Enoch, but Enoch also curiously enough made the large hammers Ludd’s followers used to smash the machines. Thus the expression began to circulate, “Enoch did make it, and Enoch will break it.” This was a period of great distress in the Midlands and North. Prices were rising and workers who had supported themselves by working from home were losing their independence and being forced into the highly-disciplined factory environment. Gathering around the banner of Ned Ludd weavers and cloth finishers attacked the new factories and destroyed the new machinery. On a number of occasions the factory owners saw what was coming and defended their business with firearms. Soldiers were also dispatched to restore order. Draconian laws were passed introducing the penalty of death for destruction of mill machinery. When the followers of Ned Ludd killed Yorkshire mill owner William Horsfall in 1812, over 60 people were arrested for this murder and an attack on a Huddersfield factory. Of the arrested men seventeen were executed on the gallows. In another prosecution for Luddite activity in Lancashire one of those arrested and executed was a 12 year old boy. By 1817 these oppressive measures had succeeded in breaking the Luddite movement and worker unrest took other avenues. The Power of Ludd The obvious question is how could the Ludd character form a rallying point for workers in different industries across a wide geographical area? Nobody today believes that Ludd was a real person who stood at the head of an organized movement. The best way of understanding this phenomenon is to place Ludd in a similar category as Robin Hood. In a similar way that Robin Hood stories came to represent the struggle of ordinary people against a repressive, powerful authority, Ludd took on the role of the protector of the workers against the encroachment of the new factory system. Ludd upheld the rights of the downtrodden handloom worker against the threat to their livelihoods from new technology and greedy employers.]]>