Categories
Breaking News

Rum's Complex History in Hawaii

Pacific Historical Review. Opposition to rum-production, however, was vehement. In 1840, a law had been passed banning the distillation of rum. Even in the tough climate of the 1850s there was little enthusiasm for repealing this law. This resistance to rum-production intrigued Kessler, particularly as it would have been relatively easy to begin the lucrative production of the alcohol. Why was there such an eschewing of economic interests on Hawai’i, with planters producing sugar, but no rum? “The short answer is that many of Hawai‘i’s influential early sugar- cane planters were temperance advocates,” Kessler explains. Honolulu supported a community of teetotalers who desired to limit the havoc which could be caused by drunken sailors. These attitudes had deep roots. Alcohol production was rejected by sugarcane producers on religious grounds. American Congregationalist missionaries had introduced sugarcane to Hawai’i in the 1820s. Initially entirely opposed due to its association with rum, sugarcane was eventually accepted by missionaries. Though they remained resolutely opposed to distilling rum, they embraced sugarcane production for its economic, environmental and social factors. Most Hawaiian sugarcane planters in the 1840s and 1850s were descended from these earlier Protestant revivalists. Opposition to the production and sale of liquor became part of the religious moral identity of the planters. “For these Protestant planters, growing sugarcane was much more than agriculture; it was an action vested with cultural and political meaning”, Kessler notes. By the 1870s, however, the opposition to rum-distillation had waned. “Without rum, underfinanced sugar producers were less likely to succeed, and foreign capital was all the more necessary to establish secure operations,” Kessler explained. Foreign investors, attracted to Hawai’i by the opportunity to invest in the plantation system of sugarcane production, did not have the same attitude towards rum as the missionaries had had. Sugar production gradually lost the cultural and moral significance it was imbued with by missionaries, and the ban against distilling rum was lifted in 1874. Hawaiian history is often subsumed into a wider history of the United States of America. Kessler’s work redresses that balance somewhat, allowing us to see both the spread of Christianity, as well as the growth in sugarcane production which was of vital importance to the Hawaiian economy until tourism began to become a lucrative industry in the mid-twentieth century. For more information: www.jstor.org Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Sandstein ]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Northern Europe Resisted Farming, Ornaments Reveal

Categories
Breaking News

New Perspectives on The War on Poverty

www.juh.sagepub.com Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Magnolia677]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Mummy “Graveyard” Sheds Light on Peruvian Death Rituals

Categories
Breaking News

New Perspectives on Hurricane Katrina

www.juh.sagepub.com Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Spellcast]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Neolithic “Spooning” Couple Baffles Scientists

Categories
Breaking News

History of NYPD Police Misconduct Traced

www.juh.sagepub.com Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Slowking4]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Modern Humans Brought Fatal Disease to Neanderthals

Homo sapiens and environmental changes, but a new study has suggested a new direction for research: disease spread. According to scientists from Cambridge and Oxford Brookes Universities, modern humans, when they left Africa and entered Europe, brought with them diseases that the Neanderthals had never encountered before and could not fight as effectively as the newcomers. In addition, because of interbreeding, modern humans became armed with immunity from some diseases that were new for them. Simon Underdown, Anthropology Lecturer at Oxford Brookes, and Charlotte Houldcroft, Infectious Diseases Researcher at Cambridge, the co-authors of the study, explain that the new diseases which modern humans brought with them could have played the lead role in the decline of the Neanderthals. Dr. Underdown states that Neanderthal populations were becoming increasingly isolated by the time modern people arrived on the European continent, gradually impoverishing their gene pools and consequently limiting their capacity to develop immunity to new diseases and even cope with already familiar ones. The research consisted of analysing a number of recent studies on the genetics of Neanderthals and early modern humans, as well as an examination of genetic research dating the origins of common pathogens. A surprising suggestion the two authors came up with based on their study is that many of the illnesses we associate with modern humans seem to have been prevalent among Neanderthals as well, including diseases such as tuberculosis and typhoid fever. Previously, these and other pathogen-caused diseases were thought to have come into being relatively recently, around 11,000 years ago, when humankind started settling down in communities and farming animals. The theory was that they had started off as ‘zoonoses’ – diseases that pass from animals to humans. Underdown and Houldcroft’s research, however, suggests that it may have been the other way round, with the diseases originating as far back as 250,000 to 40,000 years ago – the period when the Neanderthals were the dominant primate species in Europe and Asia. After modern humans had gained the upper hand and started settling in densely populated communities, they passed the diseases on to their farm animals. Another aspect in which this latest study is important is that it adds to a growing body of evidence that Neanderthals were not the backward, more-animal-than-human creatures we traditionally think they were. Instead, recent archaeological studies have revealed that Neanderthals were most likely skilled craftsmen with a pronounced aesthetic sense, even making and wearing jewellery. A supporting fact for hypotheses claiming modern humans and Neanderthals did not differ so much is interbreeding, as proven by DNA analyses of early modern humans. These analyses have revealed that early modern humans shared a lot of genes with Neanderthals, a clear indication of interbreeding that seems to have been beneficial for one of the parties, and fatal for the other. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Imageengineer]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Unexpected Text Comes to Light in Black Book of Carmarthen

Categories
Breaking News

Humans in Europe Only Recently Developed Light Skin

Home sapiens resided solely in Africa up until 700,000 BCE, with the first examples of Australopithecus afarensis, the precursor of Homo erectus, appearing there around 3.3 million years ago. Exactly when the ancestors of humans began their migration to other continents is open to debate, but the oldest human fossil ever found in Europe was discovered near Heidelberg in Germany, and dates back to 650,000 BCE. The study confirms the existing presumption that the first modern humans migrating from Africa to Europe had dark skin, which would have been beneficial in the hot African climate. However, it also found that early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg and Hungary lacked the genes responsible for pale skin as recently as 8500 years ago. Migration from the Near East is believed to have been responsible for the arrival of the genes associated with lighter skin pigmentation. As these farmers first came to the continent their interbreeding with the existing inhabitants saw the SLC24A5 gene spread through central and southern Europe, leading to lighter skin pigmentation in those regions. As the AAAS reports: “As they (farmers from the Near East) interbred with the indigenous hunter-gatherers, one of their light-skin genes swept through Europe, so that central and southern Europeans also began to have lighter skin. The other gene variant, SLC45A2, was at low levels until about 5800 years ago when it swept up to high frequency.” In northern Europe however, the situation seems to have been different. Remains studied from Southern Sweden were found to have the gene variants responsible for lighter skin and blonde hair as far back as 7,700 years ago, indicating the inhabitants of Northern Europe had light skin and eyes before the migration from the Near East. It is still unclear why the genes related to paler skin spread so quickly and so widely, but the study suggests it was probably connected to a need to absorb Vitamin D. The climate of Europe generally provides shorter days and less sunlight, particularly in the north. Lighter skin pigmentations allow the more efficient absorption and synthesis of Vitamin D (the crucial vitamin that humans can synthesize from sun light). The focus of the study was the process and rate of natural selection in Europe. By successfully charting the timing and spread of the SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 genes, the study has raised some fascinating questions. Exactly why the change in skin pigmentation occurred when it did is unclear, while the speed at which natural selection took place was much faster than typically expected. For more information: www.biorxiv.org Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Sémhur]]>