Categories
Breaking News

Grass-Based Foods in Hominin Diet Earlier Than Thought

Australopithecus afarensis diversified their diet, are important, because the dietary shift was directly linked to bipedalism and a better adaptability. When the first primates emerged on the evolutionary scene, they were pretty much tree-bound, which meant they were also bound to a certain limited number of habitats. By learning to walk on the ground, and upright at that, their hominin heirs gained access to more food sources and could move over greater distances, which meant they could survive and thrive in more diverse habitats than their ancestors. It is possible that climate change had a role to play in the dietary changes they observed, but the authors of the study report that they were unable to establish such a link firmly, instead suggesting that the emergence of new primate species was an important factor as it changed the ecology of the already existing primate communities. One of these new species was the now extinct baboon Theropithecus oswaldi, which joined the primate community around 3.76 million years ago, around the time the dietary change started to take place. It is with relation to these primates that Levin’s team found something very interesting. It appears that these large baboons started eating grass and grass-based foods before their teeth changed shape to be more suitable for grazing. This shape change only happened after they learned to walk on the ground. Study co-author Johannes Haile-Selassie from the Cleveland Museum of National History told Heritage Daily that the results “indicate that form does not always precede function. In the earliest baboons, dietary shift toward grass occurred before its teeth were specialized for grazing.” For more information: “Dietary change among hominins and cercopithecids in Ethiopia during the early Pliocene” Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Rehman Abubakr ]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Genome Sequencing Pushes Back Neanderthal Origins

Homo heidelbergensis, the species believed to have given rise to both the Neanderthals and modern humans. Homo heidelbergensis lived in Europe, Asia, and Africa around 600,000 to 250,000 years ago, according to the Science report. Later, however, tracing the origins of these fossils became complicated. Two years ago, analysis of mitochondrial DNA – the non-nuclear genetic information in the cell that is inherited on the maternal side only and is very useful in tracing a person’s ancestry – revealed that the Sima de los Huesos fossils did not have as much in common with Neanderthals as they did with another ancient hominin species, the Denisovans. Researchers suggested that the inhabitants of the Sima de los Huesos cave had interbred with Denisovans or maybe that this Denisovan mitochondrial DNA actually belonged to a common ancestor, possibly Homo erectus. This is when the Max Planck Institute of Human Evolution joined the study and tried to extract and sequence nuclear DNA to settle the matter. This took two years, with Matthias Meyer’s team focusing on a tooth and a leg bone fossil from which they managed to extract enough fragments to work with. According to Meyer, they got as many as a couple of million base pairs – not a lot but enough for a reasonable level of accuracy in the results, which were in the form of unique genetic markers for Neanderthals, modern humans, and Denisovans. What these results showed was that the occupants of the Sima cave had split from the ancestor they shared with the Denisovans more than 430,000 years ago and they were Neanderthals, the Mail Online quotes Meyer’s report from the meeting. The implications of these results are that first of all, the Neanderthals are much older than previously believed, and also that the split between them and modern humans occurred much earlier. Talking about the findings to Mail Online, palaeoanthropologist Chris Stinger from the Natural History Museum in London said the results suggested modern humans and Neanderthals split around 650,000 years ago, while Neanderthals and Denisovans separated some 450,000 years ago. This constitutes a serious shake-up of the human evolution tree, adding further evidence to the idea that it was much more complex than previously believed. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Bjorn ]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Priest Tomb Unearthed at Pre-Inca Temple in Peru

Categories
Breaking News

Navy Drove Fishing Globalisation in 16th Century England

”The globalization of naval provisioning: ancient DNA and stable isotope analyses of stored cod from the wreck of the Mary Rose, AD 1545 ” Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Leslie James Chatfield]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Love for Caffeine in America Traced Back to 750 CE

”Ritual drinks in the pre-Hispanic US Southwest and Mexican Northwest” Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Alejandro Linares Garcia]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Homo naledi – A New Link in Human Lineage

Homo naledi, was among our earliest ancestors and probably lived around three million years ago. The earliest human ancestors to date are believed to have been Ardipithecus ramidus, which, the BBC writes, probably lived around 4.4 million years ago, and based on the fossil record could both walk up right and climb trees. This H. naledi, the researchers explain, was ape-like in many ways but also had some features in common with modern humans. The skeleton found in the Rising Star cave resembled in size that of a modern human child, especially the skull, teeth and feet. It belonged, however, to an elderly female. The shoulders and pelvis were ape-like, and its brain size was likely similar to that of a gorilla. The reason it was classed as a hominin was the more advanced shape of the skull, the longer legs, the smaller teeth and the modern-like feet. The chamber in which this first skeleton was found was difficult to access because it was in the deepest recesses of the cave and one had to be quite slim to be able to pass through a constriction on the way. Yet once a team was gathered, work started and the researchers discovered something even more exciting: the chamber contained not just one remarkably well preserved skeleton but as many as fifteen, of all ages and sizes. The total number of specimens collected after three weeks of excavation reached 1,550. The scientists that analysed the fossils and tried to place them along the line of human lineage had a tough job. Some of the bones, like the tiny skulls, suggested these were apes, but others were too human-like to ignore. The conclusion was that this species lived some time between Australopithecines and Homo, Berger told the National Geographic, although he added that for him personally, these creatures belonged closer to Homo than Australopithecus. Then there is the much more fascinating question of how all these people ended up in that remote chamber of the Rising Star cave (the name of the species, by the way comes from the Sotho word for “star”). There was no fauna, tools or any other artefacts around them to suggest it was a dwelling, and there were no tooth marks on the bones, which would have been the case had they been dragged here by carnivores. One possible explanation is that they wandered into the cave and got trapped in the remote chamber but the position of the skeletons didn’t corroborate that hypothesis. The other could cause a rethinking of the fundamental link between brain size and evolution: it is the suggestion that this chamber was a burial ground, where bodies were deposited over a period of centuries. In other words, that this early species, despite its small head, was capable of allocating a special place to bury its dead, a tradition so far only found in much later hominins and up until now considered too complex behaviour to be found in such earlier species. Commenting on the news, anthropologist Isabelle Winder from the University of York, who wasn’t involved in the study, said: “Look at the hind limb of H.naledi and you will see a collection of features associated with upright stance. The forelimb, however shows ape-like characters. This may suggest that the Savannah Hypothesis, which emphasises life in Savannah mosaics, may be an incomplete explanation of human locomotion. H.naledi was a scrambler, living in complex landscapes.” Nick Winder from Newcastle University told New Historian that “If you compare the naledi material with the Dmanisi skeletons (a site in Georgia where a number of different early hominin fossils were found a few years ago) you make two striking observations. The first is that the naledi assemblage is described as morphologically homogenous — all the specimens look similar. At Dmanisi, however, there is a lot of morphological variation. Second, the mosaics of attributes in the two collections are very different. This suggests much more variability than one might have expected. There were clearly lots more ways of being a successful hominin than we imagined.” For more information: Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homofrom the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Researchers Suggest Carbon Dating is Misleading

High-resolution OSL dating of a late Quaternary sequence from Xingkai Lake (NE Asia): Chronological challenge of the “MIS 3a Mega-paleolake” hypothesis in China ]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Porridge Pre-Dates Farming, Study Finds

an earlier study, it played a major role in the evolution of the human brain. What’s more, in those times of hunter-gathering societies, heated and ground oats were easier to carry when the communities moved around as they did. Those Palaeolithic inhabitants of what is now Apulia weren’t alone in their realisation of the benefits that starch could bring them, Mariotti Lippi told Vox. Earlier studies have shown that people living at the time in central Italy ate bulrush, and in the Middle East, starch was supplied by wild wheat. There is also evidence of starch consumption from Moravia, in the eastern Czech Republic, and Russia, although what sources it was derived from for now remains unclear. One such study, conducted again by Italian researchers, looked at plant remains on grinding stones from around 30,000 years ago and found that Stone Age inhabitants of Italy, Russia, and the Czech Republic ground fern roots to make them easier to cook and digest. The lead researcher in that study, Anna Revedin from the Italian Institute of Prehistory and Early History, told New Scientist that grinding technology may have played an important part in improving Stone Age people’s survival chances in the colder seasons. Commenting on the research to New Scientist, Matt Pote, an archaeologist from University College London, said that plant-based diets had numerous benefits, which could easily be seen in the direct link between the consumption of processed grains over the last twenty millennia and the advancements of human society. According to him, the link between diet, plant food processing experiments and cultural sophistication is an area worth studying in greater depth. Another academic, Erik Trinkaus from Washington University, told the website that the discovery made by Mariotti Lippi’s team adds to evidence about the advances made by the Gravettian culture, which inhabited these parts of Europe during the Upper Palaeolithic. In fact, he says it is possible people processed and ate grains even earlier than 32,000 years ago because even older grinding stones have been found. In any case, evidence is mounting that what modern dieters call the Palaeo diet is probably far from what people actually subsisted on in that period. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Keypunch ]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Ivory May Have Driven Greenland Colonisation

Was it for walrus? Viking Age settlement and medieval walrus ivory trade in Iceland and Greenland. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user: Turelio ]]>

Categories
Breaking News

Enormous Pre-Stonehenge Monument Found in Salisbury